Blog Layout

Use of Agency Workers during Strike Action

Jul 18, 2023

UNIONS SECURE HIGH COURT VICTORY




 In the recent High Court case (England & Wales) of R (on the application of ASLEF and others) v Secretary of State for Business and Trade, the court was asked to determine whether it was lawful for the Government to revoke legislation which prohibited workers striking from being replaced by agency workers.


Since 1976 it was unlawful for an employment business knowingly to introduce or supply workers to an employer to carry out the work of employees who were taking part in official industrial action. Following industrial action in the rail sector, the Government considered it necessary to revoke this without public consultation. The Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses (Amendment) Regulations 2022 essentially allowed employers to escape the consequences of a strike and was challenged by several trade unions.


One ground of challenge by the Unions was that the Secretary of State had failed to comply with the statutory duty to consult before making the Regulations. It was also argued that the Secretary of State acted in contravention of Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights by failing to prevent unlawful interference with the rights of trade unions.


The High Court held that the decision “was not informed by, or tested against, the views of and the evidence of bodies which were representative of the interests concerned”. The challenge succeeded with the decision found to be unlawful and the Regulations were quashed.


This Judgment represents a significant victory in protecting the right to strike. The failure to ensure meaningful consultation took place with the Secretary of State skipping this fundamental step, rushing through such an important change is appalling. Moving forward, it is difficult to envisage that this item will be back on the agenda any time soon given the vast opposition to it, but at the very least, the public can expect to be consulted over any changes. 



 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ASLEF-v-Secretary-of-State-for-Business-and-Trade-judgment-130723.pdf


















Share this page

by L WARWICK 19 Apr, 2024
UK Supreme Court Rules Trade Union Law Breaches Workers’ Rights in Landmark Decision The Supreme Court has today ruled that trade union law in Britain breaches workers’ human rights failing to protect them from sanctions short of dismissal for taking part in industrial action. Mrs Mercer was a trade union representative and employee of Alternative Futures Group Ltd in the role of support worker. She was suspended during lawful strike action. She was paid basic pay losing out on overtime pay for overtime she would have otherwise worked, prevented from talking to her colleagues and was issued with a written warning. Proceedings were brought under Section 146 of the Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULCRA) claiming that she suffered a detriment short of dismissal for organising and participating in strike action. The Supreme Court was asked to determine whether TULCRA protected workers who take part in strikes during working hours from detriment short of dismissal. The Supreme Court Judges decided that the legislation did not do so because protection was only given to industrial action carried out “outside working hours”. It commented that Section 146 amounted to a lack of protection for workers and encouraged unfair and unreasonable conduct by employers. Judges held that the UK law is incompatible with Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights namely the right to freedom of association concluding that the law as it stands is in breach of human rights requirements. Taking the rare step of making a declaration of incompatibility, the court stated that “it fails to provide any protection against sanctions short of dismissal, intended to deter or penalise trade union members from taking part in lawful strike action organised by their trade union”. The UK Parliament will now consider making amendments to the legislation. Reflecting on the decision today, Orla Sheils of our Employment Law Department commented “This decision is hugely significant for trade union members and representatives engaging in industrial action and in the legal jurisdiction of Northern Ireland where Union busting is unfortunately a real issue in some workplaces, it should send a strong message to rogue employers who seek to punish their employees simply for engaging in lawful industrial action".
22 Jun, 2023
School Admissions
22 Jun, 2023
Enduring Powers of Attorney
Share by: